Welcome toGuilin talent Net
Add to Favorites | Chinese
Human affairs controversy mediates research of system legal principle
From;    Author:Stand originally
The generation of arbitral system and development and economic society expand human affairs dispute closely related, it is the result of the requirement with real progress of human affairs job and practice. Regard the arbitration as a of the process main component, arbitral mediation has the effect that cannot replace. The article tries to begin from the characteristic that mediates a system, to human affairs controversy intercessory system undertakes the explore analyse of legal principle respect.
Concept and feature
Mediation of human affairs controversy is to show in human affairs controversy arbitrates of the orgnaization chair below, it is a basis with law, code, regulations and file of other plan plasticity, undertake persuasion education, admonish to dispute party dredge, make dispute just accommodate each other each, equality talks things over, come to an agreement of one's own accord, activity of a kind of when eliminate human affairs dispute accurate judicatory. Mediation of human affairs controversy has the following feature:
Intercessory range is narrow quality. Current, although have a difference,the arbitration of human affairs controversy that visits town each gets case range, but include the resignation between staff member and place institution, dismiss and fulfill dispute of the contract that recruit.
Adjuster arises appoint a gender. Adjuster of human affairs controversy is classics arbitration appoint the designation member that arbitrate or arbitral orgnaization staff member, distinction at " arbitral law " the member that formulary party negotiates affirmatory arbitration comprises arbitral front courtyard.
Intercessory system has accurate judicatory sex. Arbitration of human affairs controversy is activity of an accurate judicatory, intercessory system regards human affairs controversy as the system of a form a complete set in arbitral process, also have accurate judicatory quality at the same time.
Intercessory book is had carry out effectiveness compulsively. Human affairs controversy mediates reached agreement to have legal effectiveness, the other one party of one party nonperformance can apply for a court to be carried out compulsively lawfully.
Legal basis and basic principle
Although look forefathers work controversy arbitrates,still remain in legislative side perfect, but build to what move solution system with perfect have specific provision, a few places still drafted governmental regulations or local code. Current, the regulation that the country mediates about human affairs controversy basically includes the following:
" officeholder law " the 100th regulation: "Human affairs controversy is arbitral ought to the principle that the basis handles legally, honestly, in time, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of controversy both sides lawfully. " this is those who mediate a system to build with perfect provided a basis.
Supreme court law commentate 2003 〕 of 〔 with law case 〔 13 numbers 2004 〕 date all stipulates case of controversy of forensic cognizance human affairs is applicable " labor law " . " labor law " the 77th, the 79th, the 80th, " industry labor dispute handles byelaw " and " the supreme court discusses rule of case comfortable usage about trying labor to contend for the explanation of a certain number of problems " all have detailed regulation to mediating a system.
Previous12 Next
About us | Legal Notices | Sitemap | Links | Partner